NPS, CES, CSAT… Which Customer Experience Metrics Should You Choose?

Explore the essential indicators – NPS, CES, and CSAT – to measure and optimize customer experience. Learn how to use them effectively to build loyalty and boost business performance.

Share:

When a customer spontaneously recommends your product… or abandons their cart at the last minute, they’re sending you a message—often without words. Every interaction, every click, every customer service call tells a story of how your customers really feel. Customer experience isn’t only about satisfaction: it’s the sum of micro-moments that shape the perception of your brand and determine whether customers will stay loyal or not.

In a saturated and highly competitive market, companies can no longer guess what their customers want. According to a 2023 PwC study, 73% of consumers say customer experience directly impacts their purchase decisions. Ignoring these signals means taking the risk of missing crucial opportunities to build loyalty and grow your business.

That’s where key metrics like NPS (Net Promoter Score), CSAT (Customer Satisfaction Score), and CES (Customer Effort Score) come into play. Each one sheds light on a different aspect: loyalty, immediate satisfaction, or journey smoothness. Together, they help you understand your customers and turn insights into actionable improvements.

In this article, discover how to measure and use them to optimize your customer experience.

Table of Contents

1. Definitions and goals of customer satisfaction metrics

NPS (Net Promoter Score)

Measures your customers’ likelihood to recommend your brand, product, or service. Based on the question: “On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend [company/product/service] to a friend or colleague?”

CategoryScoreDescription
Promoters9-10loyal, enthusiastic customers
Passives7-8satisfied but uncommitted
Detractors0-6dissatisfied customers who may harm your reputation

Formula: NPS = % Promoters – % Detractors

CSAT (Customer Satisfaction Score)

Measures satisfaction after a specific interaction. Based on: “How satisfied are you with [product/service/interaction]?”


Formula: CSAT = (Positive responses ÷ Total responses) × 100

CES (Customer Effort Score)

Measures how easy it is for a customer to complete an action or resolve an issue. Based on: “The company made it easy for me to resolve my issue.”

Formula: CES = Average customer response (usually on a 1–7 scale)

2. Three indicators compared

MetricGoalQuestion TypeScaleFrequencyScopePredictive of
NPSLoyalty & recommendation“Would you recommend…?”0–10Quarterly/Semi-annualLong-termBusiness growth
CSATImmediate satisfaction“Are you satisfied with…?”1–5 or 1–10After each interactionShort-termInstant feedback
CESEffort & ease“Was it easy to…?”1–7After processesOperationalLoyalty through ease

3. How each metric shapes customer experience

Each indicator offers a unique perspective on the customer experience. Together, they allow you to view the journey from multiple angles: loyalty, instant satisfaction, and ease of use.

NPS: Loyalty and Recommendation

NPS captures your customers’ emotional engagement and their likelihood of becoming brand advocates. It does not measure a single interaction, but rather the overall relationship the customer has with your company.
Optimal use:

  • Assess overall brand perception

  • Track long-term customer loyalty

  • Benchmark against competitors
    Real-world example: A high NPS indicates that your customers not only value your products but also speak positively about your brand to others.

CSAT: Immediate Satisfaction with an Interaction

CSAT is ideal for determining whether your customers are satisfied in the moment. It measures the quality of a specific interaction, such as a purchase, a support request, or service usage.
Optimal use:

  • Measure post-purchase or post-interaction feedback

  • Quickly identify pain points

  • Test the impact of improvements on specific services
    Tip: CSAT helps detect issues before they harm the overall relationship or customer loyalty.

CES: Customer Effort and Ease of Experience


CES focuses on the simplicity and smoothness of the customer journey. It highlights obstacles and friction points customers encounter while completing a task or resolving a problem.
Optimal use:

  • Optimize digital processes

  • Simplify administrative steps or resolution paths

  • Reduce customer effort to boost overall satisfaction
    Real-world example: A low CES means the customer was able to complete their task with ease, which in turn strengthens both satisfaction and loyalty.

In summary

NPS → Loyalty and long-term recommendation
CSAT → Immediate satisfaction, interaction by interaction
CES → Ease and effort in the customer journey

These three indicators are complementary: used together, they provide insight not only into how the customer feels, but also where and why they encounter difficulties.

5. Methods for calculating and interpreting scores

NPS Calculation Method

Calculation steps:

  1. Collect responses to the NPS question (0–10 scale)

  2. Categorize respondents:

    • Promoters: scores 9–10

    • Passives: scores 7–8

    • Detractors: scores 0–6

  3. Calculate the percentage in each category

  4. Apply the formula: NPS = % Promoters – % Detractors

NPS score interpretation:

NPS ScoreLevelMeaning
> 70🌟 ExcellentHighly loyal customers, brand advocates
50–70✅ GoodStrong satisfaction and loyalty
30–50⚠️ AcceptableModerate satisfaction, room for improvement
0–30🔄 Needs ImprovementRisk of customer churn
< 0🚨 ProblematicMore detractors than promoters

CSAT Calculation Method

Standard calculation:

  1. Define what counts as a “satisfied” response (typically 4–5 on a 5-point scale or 8–10 on a 10-point scale)
  2. Count the number of satisfied responses
  3. Divide by the total number of responses
  4. Multiply by 100 to get the percentage
 

CSAT score interpretation:

CSAT ScoreLevelRecommended Action
> 80%🌟 ExcellentMaintain and build on success
70–80%✅ GoodOptimize selectively
60–70%⚠️ SatisfactoryImprovements needed
< 60%🚨 CriticalImmediate corrective actions
 

CES Calculation Method

Calculating the Customer Effort Score:

  1. Collect responses on the defined scale (usually 1–7)
  2. Calculate the average score
  3. For clearer insights, calculate the percentage of “low effort” responses (scores 1–2 or 6–7 depending on phrasing)
 

CES score interpretation:

CES ScoreEffort LevelImpact on Experience
< 2 (or > 6)🌟 Very SmoothExceptional experience
2–4 (or 4–6)✅ AcceptableStandard experience
> 4 (or < 4)🚨 High EffortUrgent optimization required

6. Advantages and limitations of each Indicator

Net Promoter Score (NPS)

Advantages:

  • Simple and easy to understand for both customers and companies
  • Standardized metric enabling benchmarking against competitors or industry standards
  • Provides quick feedback to identify issues and take corrective action
  • Strong predictor of customer loyalty and future behavior
  • Helps segment customers to tailor retention strategies

Limitations:

  • Oversimplifies customer sentiment with a single question, lacking nuance
  • No context explaining why customers give certain scores
  • Cultural and industry differences can affect score interpretation
  • Response bias toward extreme ratings can skew results
  • Does not capture competitive dynamics or potential customer defection risks
  • Passive customers are ambiguous and can be at risk of leaving if presented with alternatives

Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)

Advantages:

  • Measures satisfaction on specific interactions in real time
  • Helps identify friction points and reaction to changes quickly
  • Easy to calculate and interpret
  • Useful for short-term service improvement

Limitations:

  • Focuses on isolated interactions, not the overall relationship
  • Satisfaction does not always correlate with loyalty
  • Can be influenced by momentary emotions or external factors
  • May miss deeper reasons behind dissatisfaction

Customer Effort Score (CES)

Advantages:

  • Focuses on effort reduction, a key driver of loyalty
  • Highlights friction points customers face during key tasks
  • Useful for optimizing processes and simplifying service interactions
  • More actionable insights to improve convenience and satisfaction

Limitations:

  • Interpretation depends on survey scale and phrasing
  • Does not capture emotional engagement or product satisfaction
  • May require additional metrics for a fuller view of customer experience
  • Sometimes less familiar to customers, affecting response rates

7. decision matrix: which indicator to choose?

SituationNPSCSATCESJustification
New product launchRecommendedEssentialOptionalNeed immediate feedback
Digital process improvementOptionalOptionalEssentialFocus on ease of use
Loyalty strategyEssentialOptionalOptionalLong-term vision crucial
Customer support optimizationRecommendedRecommendedOptionalSatisfaction + effort = performance
Competitive benchmarkingEssentialOptionalOptionalNPS easily comparable
Continuous improvementRecommendedEssentialOptionalOverall vision needed

8. practical use in the customer journey

Journey stageRecommended indicatorsMeasurement objectiveSample question
DiscoveryCES, CSATEase of finding information“Did you easily find the information you were looking for?”
EvaluationCES, CSATSimplicity of comparison“Was it easy to compare our offers?”
PurchaseCSAT, CESPurchase process satisfaction“Are you satisfied with your purchase experience?”
OnboardingCES, CSATEase of product setup“Was it easy to set up your product?”
Daily useCSAT, CESProduct/service performance“Does the product meet your expectations?”
SupportCSAT, CES, NPSQuality of problem resolution“Was your issue resolved easily?”
RenewalNPS, CSATLoyalty and overall satisfaction“Would you recommend our company?”
AdvocacyNPSLikelihood to recommend“How likely are you to recommend us?”
 

How to identify improvement opportunities

These indicators reveal different types of opportunities:

  • Low CSAT scores → Immediate service or product quality issues to address
  • High CES scores → Processes too complex and in need of simplification
  • Low NPS with correct CSAT → Emotional engagement or competitive differentiation problem

Impact on loyalty and satisfaction

Combined use of these indicators creates a virtuous cycle:

  • Improving CES reduces customer effort and raises CSAT
  • High CSAT contributes to better NPS
  • Strong NPS generates more recommendations and recurring revenue

9. Combining indicators for a holistic customer experience view

Why use NPS, CES, and CSAT together?

Using these three indicators provides a 360° view of the customer experience:

  • Complete timeline perspective: short-term (CSAT) and long-term (NPS)
  • Complementary aspects: satisfaction (CSAT), ease (CES), loyalty (NPS)
  • Different levels of analysis: isolated interactions versus overall relationship
  • Diagnostic power: precisely identify root causes of issues
 

Cross-analysis matrix of indicators

ScenarioNPSCSATCESDiagnosisPriority action
🟢🟢🟢HighHighLowOptimal performanceMaintain and build
🟢🟢🔴HighHighHighProcesses too complexSimplify experience
🟢🔴🟢HighLowLowSpecific quality problemImprove quality
🔴🟢🟢LowHighLowLack of differentiationStrengthen engagement
🔴🔴🟢LowLowLowMajor quality problemFull quality audit
🔴🔴🔴LowLowHighCustomer experience crisisGlobal Emergency plan  

Concrete interpretation examples

Case 1: High CSAT + High CES + Medium NPS

  • Situation: Clients satisfied with outcome but process is tedious
  • Action: Simplify journeys while preserving quality
  • Example: E-commerce site with good products but complicated checkout
 

Case 2: Low NPS + Correct CSAT + Correct CES

  • Situation: Operational performance OK but no emotional attachment
  • Action: Work on differentiation and brand experience
  • Example: Basic service functional but lacks perceived added value

10. Other key indicators for a holistic customer experience vision

Beyond NPS, CES, and CSAT, other KPIs provide finer operational insights into customer relations:

  • Retention rate: Measures ability to keep customers over time. High rate indicates successful experience and lasting relationship.
  • Churn rate: Opposite of retention, the percentage of customers lost. Reducing churn is a priority.
  • Customer lifetime value (CLV): Estimates total revenue one customer generates over the relationship, guiding investments toward valuable customers.
  • First contact resolution (FCR): Percentage of customer requests resolved on first contact, indicating support efficiency and quality.
  • Average response time (ART) and average handling time (AHT): Measure time before customer gets response and time to fully resolve requests, key for post-contact satisfaction.
  • Direct recommendation rate: Beyond NPS, measures actual share of new customers acquired by referral, a concrete signal of word-of-mouth strength.
 

These complementary indicators broaden the perspective the classic KPIs bring, emphasizing loyalty, operational efficiency, and customer ROI. Regular tracking allows fast identification of priority levers and CX strategy adjustment.

Conclusion

Measuring customer experience is not limited to a single indicator. NPS, CSAT, and CES each offer a unique perspective: loyalty, immediate satisfaction, and journey ease. Used together, they help you understand what your customers feel, where they face obstacles, and how to improve each interaction.

For a truly comprehensive view, it’s also essential to include complementary KPIs: retention, churn, CLV, FCR, and direct recommendation rate. These link customer experience to operational performance and ROI, enabling quick prioritization of improvement levers.

In summary, smart customer experience management relies on a multidimensional, continuous approach: listen to your customers, analyze data, act swiftly, and adjust journeys. Only this approach can turn every interaction into an opportunity, strengthen loyalty, and create a virtuous circle where satisfaction and performance go hand in hand.

Share:

Would you like to learn more about our vision for the future of customer relations?

Contact our teams to discuss your challenges.